<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Your PPC Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourppcsucks.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Wasting Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on iThemes.com: You Don&#8217;t Offer Free Wordpress Themes by towppcabrs</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/ithemescom-doesnt-offer-free-wordpress-themes/comment-page-1#comment-11422</link>
		<dc:creator>towppcabrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=3#comment-11422</guid>
		<description>rishkzpvsqqdtvdlt, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eajnghzbtv.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;zwyuphuzpi&lt;/a&gt; , [url=http://www.jqvtsagsqk.com]ifudqjaxlu[/url], http://www.rxqdanjxtj.com zwyuphuzpi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rishkzpvsqqdtvdlt, <a href="http://www.eajnghzbtv.com" rel="nofollow">zwyuphuzpi</a> , [url=http://www.jqvtsagsqk.com]ifudqjaxlu[/url], <a href="http://www.rxqdanjxtj.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rxqdanjxtj.com</a> zwyuphuzpi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ladies, Debenhams says your feet stink by Stink ladies &#124; Jeteata</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/ladies-debenhams-says-your-feet-stink/comment-page-1#comment-10426</link>
		<dc:creator>Stink ladies &#124; Jeteata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=483#comment-10426</guid>
		<description>[...] Ladies, Debenhams says your feet stink &#124; Your PPC SucksJul 22, 2010 &#8230; photo credit: stuartpilbrow According to Debenhams PPC targeting, Women&#8217;s shoes posses a rather pungent smell and they have a sale? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ladies, Debenhams says your feet stink | Your PPC SucksJul 22, 2010 &#8230; photo credit: stuartpilbrow According to Debenhams PPC targeting, Women&#8217;s shoes posses a rather pungent smell and they have a sale? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Braille PPC Ads &#8211; Everyone knows not to use &#8216;SEE&#8217; right? by Eschatonic</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/braille-ppc-ads-just-dont-mention-se/comment-page-1#comment-9672</link>
		<dc:creator>Eschatonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=108#comment-9672</guid>
		<description>That second one has to be an attempt at humour. It&#039;s too obvious not to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That second one has to be an attempt at humour. It&#8217;s too obvious not to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bluurrry Facebook Ad Image by john tin</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/bluurrry-facebook-ad-image/comment-page-1#comment-8937</link>
		<dc:creator>john tin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=737#comment-8937</guid>
		<description>omg. nooooob alert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg. nooooob alert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I don&#8217;t wanna pay stamp! by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/i-dont-wanna-pay-stamp/comment-page-1#comment-8671</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=882#comment-8671</guid>
		<description>Bing allows for 1 70 character line not two 35 character lines as Google does</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing allows for 1 70 character line not two 35 character lines as Google does</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grammatically Offensive Facebook Adverts by Phill Ohren</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/grammatically-offensive-facebook-adverts/comment-page-1#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill Ohren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=780#comment-8497</guid>
		<description>Man, that&#039;s a pretty awful FBppc ad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, that&#8217;s a pretty awful FBppc ad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASCII Artwork in PPC Ads: Bring It Back Google! by Phill Ohren</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/ascii-artwork-in-ppc-ads-bring-it-back-google/comment-page-1#comment-8496</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill Ohren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=123#comment-8496</guid>
		<description>Fantastic creatives. Although you are right, it would make G more money, I think they&#039;ll probably put a stop to these as it&#039;s not &quot;fair&quot; on other advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic creatives. Although you are right, it would make G more money, I think they&#8217;ll probably put a stop to these as it&#8217;s not &#8220;fair&#8221; on other advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Search Bar Suggestion Blooper : Eat A Midget by Cristian Giordano</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/google-search-bar-suggestion-bloope-eat-a/comment-page-1#comment-6823</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian Giordano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=152#comment-6823</guid>
		<description>That is actually a browser auto complete and not a Google suggestion. 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is actually a browser auto complete and not a Google suggestion. </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.yourppcsucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Someone Forgot To Finish Their PPC Advertisement by Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement/comment-page-1#comment-6729</link>
		<dc:creator>Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=203#comment-6729</guid>
		<description>After reading about a similar experiment in WMW or SEW, I tried this a few years ago - surprisingly the CTR and conversion rate were both OK. Not better, but not worse than proper ad copies. I would bet that this particular ad copy would perform better than most as long as:
1. Your headline/display URI are good
2. the KWs in the adgroup are not ambiguous
3. your product/offer is good enough that you do not need to qualify the clicks through the adtext
4. no competing ad is using that trick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading about a similar experiment in WMW or SEW, I tried this a few years ago &#8211; surprisingly the CTR and conversion rate were both OK. Not better, but not worse than proper ad copies. I would bet that this particular ad copy would perform better than most as long as:<br />
1. Your headline/display URI are good<br />
2. the KWs in the adgroup are not ambiguous<br />
3. your product/offer is good enough that you do not need to qualify the clicks through the adtext<br />
4. no competing ad is using that trick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ladies, Debenhams says your feet stink by BABs - the Bad Advertising Bot</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/ladies-debenhams-says-your-feet-stink/comment-page-1#comment-6673</link>
		<dc:creator>BABs - the Bad Advertising Bot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=483#comment-6673</guid>
		<description>Thanks for both your comments! 

Both fair points - we meant it in a light-hearted rant, honest! Appreciate what both you guys are saying in terms of the keywords matching, however the focus of the article should be on the very weak advert copy and poor targeting. Also surely, you would add &#039;smell&#039; as a negative?!

Thom - Thanks to those with fetishes who do send us the odd provocative find. 

Mel - We will try to limit our ire ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for both your comments! </p>
<p>Both fair points &#8211; we meant it in a light-hearted rant, honest! Appreciate what both you guys are saying in terms of the keywords matching, however the focus of the article should be on the very weak advert copy and poor targeting. Also surely, you would add &#8217;smell&#8217; as a negative?!</p>
<p>Thom &#8211; Thanks to those with fetishes who do send us the odd provocative find. </p>
<p>Mel &#8211; We will try to limit our ire <img src='http://www.yourppcsucks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

