<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Someone Forgot To Finish Their PPC Advertisement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Wasting Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:13:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement/comment-page-1#comment-6729</link>
		<dc:creator>Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=203#comment-6729</guid>
		<description>After reading about a similar experiment in WMW or SEW, I tried this a few years ago - surprisingly the CTR and conversion rate were both OK. Not better, but not worse than proper ad copies. I would bet that this particular ad copy would perform better than most as long as:
1. Your headline/display URI are good
2. the KWs in the adgroup are not ambiguous
3. your product/offer is good enough that you do not need to qualify the clicks through the adtext
4. no competing ad is using that trick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading about a similar experiment in WMW or SEW, I tried this a few years ago &#8211; surprisingly the CTR and conversion rate were both OK. Not better, but not worse than proper ad copies. I would bet that this particular ad copy would perform better than most as long as:<br />
1. Your headline/display URI are good<br />
2. the KWs in the adgroup are not ambiguous<br />
3. your product/offer is good enough that you do not need to qualify the clicks through the adtext<br />
4. no competing ad is using that trick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederik</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement/comment-page-1#comment-4571</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=203#comment-4571</guid>
		<description>I actually had a best-converterting ad, that only had &quot;:)&quot; in Description.
So i definitely thinks it&#039;s worth trying atypical, even if it doesn&#039;t make that much sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had a best-converterting ad, that only had &#8220;:)&#8221; in Description.<br />
So i definitely thinks it&#8217;s worth trying atypical, even if it doesn&#8217;t make that much sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamersan</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement/comment-page-1#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamersan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=203#comment-624</guid>
		<description>The question is, did the ad stand out enough to where someone might notice it more?  I&#039;d be interested in the click through ratio of this ad versus the same ad with crappy copy on the two lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, did the ad stand out enough to where someone might notice it more?  I&#8217;d be interested in the click through ratio of this ad versus the same ad with crappy copy on the two lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krishna</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement/comment-page-1#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>krishna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=203#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I tried a similar search on Google(US n UK). But couldn&#039;t find any. How did u find this bloke?..are you making this search in any other country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried a similar search on Google(US n UK). But couldn&#8217;t find any. How did u find this bloke?..are you making this search in any other country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adwordsanzeigen die nicht ganz fertig sind - Allgemeines - iBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.yourppcsucks.com/someone-forgot-to-finish-their-ppc-advertisement/comment-page-1#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Adwordsanzeigen die nicht ganz fertig sind - Allgemeines - iBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourppcsucks.com/?p=203#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] vor ein paar Tagen haben die Kollegen bei Your PPC Sucks eine ganz nette Anzeige gefunden. Ein klassischer Fall von, die Anzeige wurde nicht fertig [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vor ein paar Tagen haben die Kollegen bei Your PPC Sucks eine ganz nette Anzeige gefunden. Ein klassischer Fall von, die Anzeige wurde nicht fertig [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

